Over 50 comments on the Detailed Spatial Plan for ​​the concession area for the exploitation of mineral resources Brskovo and the Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment for the mentioned DSP, in which the arguments for which we consider that the reopening of the Brskovo mine is not acceptable for Montenegro, the NGO Green Home sent today to the Ministry of Ecology, Spatial Planning and Urbanism, on the occasion of the end of the public hearing for these two documents. Arguments against such a project are drawn from the documents that are on public debate, but also from the previous experience of the Brskovo mine, the tailings dump in Mojkovac that for decades polluted the environment and affected the health of the citizens of Mojkovac and the whole Montenegro, but also from the consequences of the mine’s operation, which are present today in the form of pollution of the surrounding agricultural land. In addition, we consider unacceptable the way the public discussion was organized and the communication that was carried out with interested citizens on that occasion, which was followed by a series of controversies, from the disrespect of the gathered citizens by the representatives of the Ministry of Ecology, Spatial Planning and Urbanism, leaving the public discussion, without providing answers to the gathered citizens, and public reactions of planners and plan processors. The largest zinc mine in Europe is planned to be positioned in the protection zone of the Biogradska gora national park, in the country that is ecological according to the constitutional definition. The protection zone (buffer zone) is, according to the Law on Nature Protection, an area that is determined in order to prevent or mitigate negative impacts on those areas which is in direct conflict with the opening of mines in the park’s protective zone. The plan is not in accordance with the Special purpose spatial plan Biogradska gora and completely ignores the activities that are planned in the park’s protective zone, namely tourism, sports and agricultural activities. The Ministry of Ecology, Spatial Planning and Urbanism had to request an opinion from UNESCO regarding the implementation of this project, bearing in mind that the planned area overlaps with the boundaries of the Man & Biosphere Reserve, and that the project threatens to pollute the Tara River and affect the national park as well. Durmitor, and that it is about the surface of the exploration and exploitation area of ​​4.6 km², of which 71% is under forest. The two tailings ponds planned by this project have a planned volume that is almost 5 times larger than the previous tailings pond, which means that the risk of pollution of the Tara River, which is constant, is five times greater. The previous tailings dump was rehabilitated 20 years after the mine was closed, the works lasted 6 years and 10.6 million euros of citizens’ money and donations were set aside for them. The documentation does not specify whether the project foresees an SQ account for funds intended for the closure and reclamation process of mines that cannot be used for other purposes, so the question remains whether reclamation will be implemented behind this project at all. Soil tests, even on agricultural land, as well as surface water tests, which were carried out 30 years after the closure of the mine, show increased values ​​of heavy metals in almost all analyzed parameters and localities and tell us in support of how serious and long-term the consequences would be on the ecosystems, but also on the health and quality of life of citizens, this project had. Heavy metals do not break down easily in the soil and they accumulate in the food chain, thus causing a large probability of causing extensive damage to the human body. Another worrisome factor is the fact that there are broken settlements in the area that are individually supplied with water in an area where the water can be contaminated with heavy metals due to the operation of the mine. In addition, in the existing infrastructure and method of operation, sanitary protection measures are not implemented for any water source in Mojkovac, and the operation of the mine would increase the risk of contamination of water sources and water used for drinking. The plan presented a public opinion survey without information about who did the survey, with a subjectively posed hypothesis and suggestive answers in which the population of Mojkovac was supposedly surveyed. This project will have an impact on the environment and the health of the citizens of the wider area and requires an objective survey of the public opinion of the citizens of the whole of Montenegro. On the other hand, the Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment for the DSP for the concession area for the exploitation of mined raw materials does not provide adequate measures to reduce the impact on the environment. There are no answers to numerous questions regarding the environmental protection of the project area, and the measures that have been given have not been implemented and therefore will not ensure the preservation of the environment. It is left to the investor to evaluate how “fast” is really fast and recommendations are given to the investor to apply the technologies that are “best” and with the “least impact” which in practice has no meaning. It is not even stated that it is a protective zone of the park, but the space is treated as an area outside the protected zone. Also, the impact of the project on the biodiversity of the protected area of ​​NP Biogradska gora and NP Durmitor is not adequately stated.